"Catalyst"
If I may I would like to express a negative critique of the future computer architecture which, perhaps, your book is ready.
Writing on "interactivity" She states that the architecture must strive to be continuously modified into [...] an environment that adapts to the changing desires of users, I would add, in the name of the "new subjectivity" rather than opens the "new objectivity" of the modern movement.
In my opinion, however, such an architecture might become a product of industrial, commercial, custom certainly, but comparable to a Smart!
would risk falling into the trap of promising marketing to users / customers more personalized environments and then filling them
electronic systems with which we architects do not have much to do ...
The industry could take over our world at least for residential use. For example, you could mass-produce housing type, with the help of electronics, adapt to the tastes of customers imagine and live in a personalized environment.
Now my question is: "What role will the future architect in the process of personalization architecture?
We still aesthetes? And if so, only on behalf of society and therefore in the public works?
Maybe that's why that the collective imagination, to conclude from the film, the architecture of the future is colorless, tasteless and cold!
0 comments:
Post a Comment